Answer:
1. increase the use of special prosecutors in police misconduct investigation.
2.enhance the collection of data on fatalities.
3.conclusion
4.increase the federal governments oversight of police conduct.
Explanation:
A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
A 2-month-old is diagnosed with Hirschsprung disease with the resulting development of a megacolon. <u>absence of intrinsic </u><u>ganglion cells</u><u> resulting in impaired peristalsis</u><u> </u>is the most likely cause of this condition.
The vertebrate retina's ganglion cells are the last neurons to leave the cell. In the retinal wiring design, the ganglion cell gathers the electrical messages pertaining to the visual signal from the two layers of nerve cells that come before it. All common excitatory or inhibitory retinal neurotransmitters are reacted with by ganglion cells.
The retina's deepest layer, which is closest to the lens and front of the eye, contains ganglion cells. The elements of the visual world are extracted by ganglion cells, encoded in frequency-modulated spike trains, and sent coursing along the axons of the optic nerve to various visual brain areas.
To know more about ganglion cells
brainly.com/question/3179156
#SPJ4
The law of moral cause-and-effect is called the law of Karma.
Depending on whoever you ask, there are several opinions on what karma really is. While some adhere to the traditional interpretation rooted in Eastern religions, others interpret it more in line with a Western conception of good and evil. This can consequently result in various interpretations of how karma functions in life. This law states that whatever ideas or energy one put out, one receives back, whether it's positive or negative. One must embody and merit the things they want in order to obtain them. It's the idea that you harvest what one sows. Memories and wants are shaped by karma, which then dictates how one lives. The karmic software that controls one's existence is comprised of actions, memories, and desires.
To learn more about the Law of Karma refer to:
brainly.com/question/18175497
#SPJ1
Answer:
You can consult Jschlatt about this topic, but until then I think I'll do.
Explanation:
In general, they don't care. That's why it's a sweatshop and not a normal business. The employers are typically in it for the money, which is why the conditions are so unideal (understatement). Someone who valued human life wouldn't force underpaid, malnourished children (or adults for that matter) to work in such horrible circumstances.