1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
2 years ago
15

Does supply-side economics work? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
SVEN [57.7K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It depends

Explanation:

<h3>What is Supply-Side Economics?</h3>

Supply side economics is an economic theory that supports deregulation and tax cuts. It focuses on making business easier believing in positive effects that will be felt by the entire economy. It encourages businesses and the wealthy to save or invest, increasing GDP and ultimately growing the economy. In sum, it is a form of fiscal policy that benefits businesses before consumers. (Opposite of Keynesian theory)

This theory can be visualized and a little bit better explained with something called the Laffer Curve. I've attached an image of this curve on my answer that might aid your understanding.

The laffer curve works like this: On the x-axis you'll see the tax rate and on the y-axis you'll see government revenue. You'll notice that it is a bowed-out shape, indicating that as tax rates increase past a certain point, government revenue actually decreases. This is because the tax rate is so high that the marginal benefit of working becomes close to 0, and the wealthy have little incentive to work because their wealth will go to the government anyway. Supply-side economics uses this theory to advocate for lower tax rates that will incentivize people to work, invest, save, and ultimately be part of the economy.

<h3>Does it work?</h3>

The short and easiest answer to if supply-side economics works is it depends. This is because it really depends on the specific policy, how it;'s implemented, and the overall state of the economy. Additionally, it also depends on what is specifically meant by "Does it work?" Is economic growth the only factor being considered?
As you can see by the Laffer curve, if tax rates are already past the vertex, supply-side economics will increase tax revenue while keeping the economy productive. However, if it has not reached the vertex yet, and further tax cuts are made, the economy may grow, but the government may find itself in debt due to not enough revenue.
On the other hand, if the economy is in a recession, tax cuts are certainly able to boost the economy by giving people more spending power. If the economy isn't, drastic tax cuts could result in inflation. Moreover, economists disagree on whether the trickle-down economic benefit really exists. Some have found that tax cuts increase GDP, while others believe that there is a minimal effect.

<h3 /><h3>History of Supply-Side Economics</h3>

As I mentioned previously, the base of supply-side economics is really the Laffer Curve, which was created by economist Arthur Laffer back in the 1970s. However, what really made supply-side economics a widely known phenomenon is President Ronald Reagan and his economic policy in the 1980s, which is why supply-side economics is often referred to as Reaganomics. You can further evaluate the effectiveness of supply-side economics by looking at the effects of its implementation throughout history.  For example, Reagan's implementation of the policy was able to drastically reduce the stagflation in the time period, however, it also contributed massively to the US national debt due to the lower tax revenues.
President Bush also utilized this policy, though the positive effects on the economy are often contributed to other factors and some even argue that he set the economy up for failure during the 2008 recession by increasing deficits.


Of course, the economy is a complicated system that depends on a variety of factors, so it is impossible to contribute economic growth to one cause. Therefore, it really depends on other factors, the state of the economy, and the implementation of the policy to truly determine if supply-side economics work in each scenario.

Learn more about supply-side economics here:

brainly.com/question/27626603

You might be interested in
Discuss the political components of the "roosevelt coalition" formed in the 1930s. what did the new deal offer to the diverse el
Sauron [17]
The "Roosevelt coalition" or the "new deal coalition" is an alignment of different groups that from 1932 until the late 1960s voted for the Democratic party candidates and supported the New Deal.  The Labor unions got more leverage in negotiating and more protection, The South, mostly farmers, got electricity and water while farmers in general were guaranteed basic level income by certain programs. The poor got new government jobs and income bonuses. All of them benefited from the revitalized economy that came from the New Deal.
<span />
6 0
3 years ago
What was a main goal of the Panama Canal?
Marta_Voda [28]

the correct answer is

A. to allow the U.S. Navy to travel quickly from ocean to ocean

hope i helped please mark as brainliest :)

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one of Abraham Lincolns biggest problems during the civil war?
Anni [7]

Lincoln had to deal with not only the challenge of the South seceeding from the United States, but also the challenge of raising an army from Northern States who didn't want to get into a war.

7 0
3 years ago
Most global economies are pure market economies that operate without government regulation. Please select the best answer from t
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The global economies that can exist in a country are divided into three:

a. Pure market ( free market economy

b. Command economy

c. Mixed economy which consists of both the pure market and command economy).

The pure market( free market ) economy is also referred to as the economy that has capitalism present in it.

Pure market economy is the economy practised by a country whereby owners of businesses can make their own decisions independent of the government. The government has no influence on the running of the firms or the value been placed in the products the firm produces. In a pure market economy, goods and services are exchanged voluntarily. Buying and Selling of goods and services are carried out in a competitive markets.

The raw materials or resources needed, are given to firms with high prices and a high production capacity that meets the needs of the country.

Pure market economy is not regulated by the government and it occurs in Democratic governments.

Not all global economies practise the pure market economy. An example of a country or global economy that practises the pure market economy is the United States of America.

4 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP ME OM THIS TEST
Annette [7]

Answer:

A. The United States declared war on Japan.

Explanation:

After the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, which is shown in the picture, the United States president, Franklin D. Roosevelt immediately went to congress to get approval for war on Japan.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Cuales son las causas coyunturales y estructurales de la Revolución Francesa.
    6·1 answer
  • Samuel Adams did not agree with taxes impose by?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the result of the second Anglo-Powhatan war??
    9·1 answer
  • What do criminal laws seek to prevent?
    8·1 answer
  • The first "travel information agency" opened when? 1600s 1700s 1800s 1900s
    14·1 answer
  • How did Paleolithic people first hunt?
    9·2 answers
  • Which term is a unit of measure used to measure frequency in cycles or waves per second?
    14·1 answer
  • I need a kkk long term
    15·1 answer
  • What is a secondary source? How do historians analyze secondary sources differently than they analyze primary sources (100-200 w
    10·1 answer
  • Is the Deccan Plateau suitable for settlement?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!