1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
A regulatory agency that attempts to limit risk in the banking system is a "government agency", since only the federal government can legally have power over the banks and their policies.
"<span>Many young people rebelled against their parents' politics and values" is by far the best choice since many in the movement were against the war and very liberal. </span>
When I search it, the only thing that comes up is “The Federal-Aid Highway Act” :/ I hope this helps at least a bit