<span>The correct answers are: 1)D The statement refers to a situation in which the rights of other people are interfered by the guilty party, who cannot plead innocence through the right of "freedom of speech", as it is relatively "inferior"or of no importance considering the transgression of others' rights.
It is not an example of absolute, natural rights nor of civil rights (although it is about freedom of speech, which is a civil right), since its focus is about the peculiar situation, regarding relative rights.
2)B Civil liberties are a protective form of freedoms, or "liberties" which cannot be touched by the government, without due process.
3)B The Constitution initially didn't have a bill of rights and this became a controversial issue, focusing on the necessity to limit the governement's power.</span>
During World War II, security concerns in the United States prompted B) the internment of the Japanese.
The fear that those of Japanese decent, even if they were generationally American, would become a safety concern led to their internment. This infringed on the American right to trial.
Hope I could help!
Their ability to create bigger damage in a certain area. Using bombers and zeppelins makes it easier for them to attack. These bombers can injure at least 3,400 people in one place and can kill at least 1,400 people. Thus, countries were more encouraged to use aircraft weaponry in the World War I
