I think the prime reason why a government would be unstable is when the government's actions and powers do not match with the needs of the populace. Those needs can be many different things and can be different things at different times: food, shelter, infrastructure, protection from bad neighbors, protection from invaders... the list would take me a day and a half.
If you look back at the collapse of the USSR, there was a misalignment between the people's needs and what the government gave. If you look at the current USA, the least stable places are where government is deliberately creating friction with the citizens, and close to that are the places where government is not creating a good framework for people's needs to be met.
Corruption can be a symptom of this mismatch, but in and of itself is not the prime reason for instability. Go look at various nation-states throughout history. The unstable governments were and are the ones where a large segment of people felt the government wasn't doing anything to help them with their needs.
Answer: Taoist art began to be made, and China established its architectural culture, adopting the Buddhist way of paying homage through art. Buddhism in China has changed as well. Buddhist schools have been developed and Confucianism and Taoism concepts have also been incorporated into Buddhism.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps you! : )
Answer:
Explanation:
Become a christian it is worth it
<span>Children gain control of their legs and feet well enough to walk well (without support) around 12 months of age. Before this, they are likely to walk with an adult's support around ten months of age. Both of these come after the child has built up their larger muscles and gained control of the trunk of their body.</span>
<span>This study best illustrates the: biasing power of diagnostic labels. It was found that when told by the study performers that the interviewees were patients in a mental institution, the participants in the study prejudged them and did not see them without a bias. Thus, they attributed the interviewees as having fit that particular stereotype and confirmed the bias.</span>