Answer:
Mar-grave is the title for an individual appointed by the Reinaldo Council who leads a city in the Republic of Reinaldo.
Answer:
negative sanction
Explanation:
Sanctions can be defined as the means of enforcing rules.
Sanctions can be positive as well as negative.
A sanction is said to be positive when rewards are given for conforming to norms. Getting a promotion at work is a positive sanction for working hard.
Negative sanctions on the other hand are punishments given to people for violating norms. Being arrested is a punishment for shoplifting. Both types of sanctions play a role in social control.
We also have formal and informal sanctions.
Formal sanctions are the official ways to recognize and enforce violation of norms. In the event a student violates her college’s code of conduct, for example, she might be expelled. When an employee speaks inappropriately to the boss, he could be fired.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
It will determine the future security of the nation
Answer:
yes, Sally is legally entitled to the home
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand, we can say that yes, Sally is legally entitled to the home. This is because with the verbal agreement that Sally made with Laura, she was granted consideration in exchange for helping and caring for her. This is a legal term describing value that is interchanged between two parties. Which in this case the value is caring and helping Laura in exchange for being named an heir to her home.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
