Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
5.37%
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
We can calculate the company’s after tax return on preferred by using following formula:-
Company’s After Tax Return = Before Tax Dividend Yield Rate on Preferred Stock × [1 - (1 - Dividend Exclusive) × (Tax Rate)]
= 6% × [1 - (1 - 70%) × (35%)]
= 0.06 × [1 - (1 - 0.70) × (0.35)]
= 0.06 × [1 - (0.30) × (0.35)]
= 0.06 × (1 - 0.105)
= 0.0537
= 5.37%
We simply applied the above formula to determine the company after tax return
Answer:
Po = <u>D1</u> + <u>D2</u> + <u> D3</u>
(1 + Ke) (1 + Ke)2 (1 + Ke)3
Po = <u>$12</u> + <u>$12.50</u> + <u>$28
</u>
(1 + 0.1) (1 + 0.1)2 (1 + 0.1)3
Po = <u>$12</u> + <u>$12.50</u> + <u>$28</u>
1.1 (1.1)2 (1.1)3
Po = $10.91 + $10.33 + $21.04
Po = $42.28
Explanation:
The current stock price is a function of future dividends capitalised at the cost of capital of the company of 10% for a period of 3 years.
Answer:
18.65%
Explanation:
Cost = $12,300
Total Payment = $420 × 36
= $15,120
Difference in the cost and payment = $15,120 - $12,300 = $2,820
Interest rate is the ratio of the interest to the original cost of the item.
The interest is the difference between the amount paid and the actual cost.
Interest rate = ($2,820/$15,120) × 100%
= 18.65%
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
In 2017, Lynx earned an accounting profit of $3 million.
Lynx's production facilities might have also been used to produce components for mobile phones, which would have generated $2 million in revenues and saved the company $500,000 in production costs.
The accounting profit involves only explicit costs. While economic profit includes both explicit as well as implicit cost.
Here, the implicit cost is the opportunity cost of producing toys components. Lynx could have earned greater profit if it produced components for mobile phone and also could have saved cost of production.
Economic profit
= accounting profit - implicit cost
= $3 million - ($2 million + $500,000)
= $3 million - $2.5 million
= $500,000
So, Lynx had an economic profit of $500,000.
