The question above wants to assess your ability to interpret a text and argue over that interpretation. For that reason, I can't write this script for you, but I'll show you how you can write it.
First, you need to understand what Dee and Magie represent in the story and what qualities they both have that make them apt to inherit the quilts. You can search for articles that analyze the two characters and give you greater insight into the two girls.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
- Introduce who you deem worthy of receiving the quilts.
- Show what these quilts represent.
- Show the reasons why you considered this girl deserving of the quilts.
- Show why the other girl is not worthy of receiving the quilts.
Importantly, Dee is a woman who became involved in black activism, defending the exposure and pride of African ancestry. However, this placement is seen as something aesthetic for Dee's family. Her mother doesn't believe that Dee is actually representing black people, as black people are resilient people who take care of their families and face challenges with courage rather than ornaments like Maggie.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15186187?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Which passage is this question talking about?
Explanation:
Athanasius thought of the gold as an opportunity to help people whereas John fled from the scene as if he was being chased by a monster thinking that taking gold out of somewhere was a sin.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Athanasius wanted to take the gold as he saw no sin in helping the neighbor population with it but everything John felt was fear as soon as he saw the gold.
- John was a man of simple ethics and lifestyle and didn't want any complications to his life.
- Athanasius was a man of his own doings and always liked to think otherwise. He believed the bag of gold was a gift from an angel.
- John believed in changing things for people by on's hard work and determination.
- Both the brothers varied with different perspectives on life.
