Answer:
c) The investment is mutually exclusive with another investment under consideration.
Explanation:
The main indicator as to whether or not accept a project or not is the net present value (NPV). Only projects with a positive NPV should be considered. On the other hand, the internal rate of return (IRR) has a couple of issues and is not that reliable because it does not consider the size of the projects, or associated future costs, or even the duration of the projects. The IRR is not a good method to evaluate long term projects.
So when you have to compare mutually exclusive projects, the IRR should not be considered due to the issues previously mentioned.
<span>One reason a new cable company may be unsuccessful when entering the market is if they charge too much for installation. Established companies are usually able to offer free installation. Another problem arises when the new cable company has a different channel lineup than other companies already in the area. Most people don't want to give up channels they are used to having, especially if one of those channels shows a current popular show.</span>
Answer:
Option D high; high
Explanation:
The reason is that the Raymond knows about where Lotus Notes begins and where it ends, so the influence of Raymond is higher which means he has higher bargaining power because the person required as an alternative who will come and review the software from start will cost IBM much more, so the company has limited its bargaining power due to over relaince on Raymond Ozzie. This means this limited bargaining power is due to high cost of shift from Raymond to anyother software designer.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true since acceptance strategy is a risk management technique in which small risks with little impacts on the organization are identified but not curtailed just because the impacts of such identified risks are not beyond what the company can bear.
Thus, possibly rendering the managers unable to conduct proactive security activities and portray an apathetic approach to security in general.
If the Fed decided that virtual money should be included in money supply, we would see a situation where both <u>M1 </u><u>and </u><u>M2 increase/ rise. </u>
M1 is:
- The most liquid money instruments
- Inclusive of cash and close instruments
If virtual money was counted as money, it would increase M1 because virtual money is very liquid as it can easily be converted to cash so it would be counted as M1.
M2 would increase because M1 is part of M2.
In conclusion, both M1 and M2 would increase.
<em>Find out more about M1 and M2 at brainly.com/question/25458814.</em>
