The unhealthy and healthy thing about the relationship between Romeo and Juliet was infatuation and commitment.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>"These violets delights have violet ends</em>
<em>And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,</em>
<em>which as a kiss, consume"</em>
<em>- Romeo and Juliet, Act II, scene IV</em>
<u>Unhealthy relationship of Romeo and Juliet.</u>
To begin with their relationship, love at first sight is not exactly love. Most of the time it is infatuation. Such love story would end with no proper understanding and hatred. Love at first sight usually happens when the mind is immature yet it works out rarely which wasn't exactly the case of Romeo and Juliet.
The idea of playing with death only lead to misconception between Romeo and Juliet relationship leading to a tragic end.
<u>Healthy relationship of Romeo and Juliet</u>
Romeo and Juliet some way or the other they were the ones for each other. It could have been an infatuation but their commitment was strong and powerful no matter who told what. They trusted and believed in each other and were sensitive enough to die.
<em></em>
This can fit into the category of Hasty Generalization, this is, that you generalize with a lack of evidence or better,reasons as of to state that the trilogy of the Lord of The Rings isgood. It is good because it is good, if the first part is good, then all the trilogy is good.
Another option might be a fallacy called <em>ad populum </em> which takes place whenever you appeal to the public knowledge of something to prove it is true. In this case forexample, you could say: the reviews are giving this movie 5 stars, so this movie is good, because people like it.
Answer:
bellow:
Explanation:
the charater traits, wheather the character is antognist or protagnist
