Answer:
1- Dominant --- most common or influential
2- Morals --- ideas about what is right and good
3- Rule of law --- the idea that everyone should be treated equally by the law
4- Intrinsic --- part of the basic nature of something
5- Ethics --- a set of rules that govern behavior
Explanation:
1- Dominant is understood as that political, social or cultural position that is majority or predominant in a certain place or sector. For example, the dominant political stance in the university sociological sector in the United States is the Democratic Party.
2- Moral is the set of internal rules that each person has regarding their behavior and their relationship with the rest of society, which are imposed by the individual on the basis of his social, historical and religious context.
3- The rule of law is the system of law that establishes freedom, equality, and equity among all citizens who are members of a community or nation. Through this, equality is guaranteed before the law and illegitimate inequalities such as slavery are prohibited.
4- An intrinsic question is that which is inherent in the very existence of the individual or thing to which it refers. For example, for liberal thinkers, freedom is intrinsic to the human condition.
5- Ethics is the set of social and legal norms that govern the conduct of society, through norms that may be imperative and enforceable for individuals.
The given statement that A con of being in a single decision-maker role is that is usually takes longer to make a decision is false.
<h3>What is decision-making?</h3>
Decision-making refers to the process of creating options by discovering a decision, collect content, and evaluating alternative resolutions.
When there is only one decision-maker, decisions are made more quickly.
This is due to the fact that time-consuming processes like debate, consultation, and compromise are not required.
This is why democratic administrations take such a long time to operate or make drastic reforms.
However, there are certain positives to the long process, such as the ability to poll more people and the reduced likelihood of power abuse.
Therefore, the given statement is False.
Learn more about the decision-making process, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13244895
<u>Answer:</u>
The United States acquired the Philippines as a result of the Spanish-American war.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The Spanish American war was the result of the dispute among the states in 1898.
- The war was ended by signing the 'treaty of Paris'. This treaty included that the power to rule Philippines along with 'Cuba Puerto Rico', and 'Guam', was shifted to US.
- This treaty also involves that the shifting of sovereignty of Philippines to US needed a compensation of 20 million to Spanish government.
Answer:
(A.) It was the site of a massacre of Lakota Sioux by US troops in 1890.
EDGE2020
Answer:
no the U.S. should not have colonies as it can shatter unity all the colonies will do their own thing and can lead to bad thing.
wars will take place more often between the colonies for particular things like a mines.
this could create mass wars and death.
if they had to fight a war they would all be defeated easily and each colonies will do what they feel is right.
if colonies are made in the U.S. it can lead to mostly bad thing. Thus U.S. should not have even a single colony
