If you assume that Marcus must have been in a good mood because he helped Juanita pick up some books she dropped, according to attribution theory, his attribution is internal and unstable.
An internal attribution occurs when someone assigns some personal reason to justify an external event, rather than regarding the event as an environmental attribution.
- Like for example the belief that Marcus was in a good mood because of an external event.
The attribution is also unstable in that it assumes that a behavior is due to a temporary and unstable factor, meaning Marcus' good mood can change over time.
Therefore, the attribution given to Marcus is internal and unstable.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/15838795
Answer:
motivated blindness
Explanation:
Motivated Blindness can be defined as a systemic failure to perceive unethical conduct. The term motivated blindness was first used by Max H. Bazerman and Ann E. Tenbrunsel in their book "Blind Spots."
They define the term as a failure to see the unethical conduct of others when they know that is would not be in their best interest to notice it.
<u>In the given case, the cause of Alonzo's behavior is because of his motivated blindness. He, as a president of the student class, overlooked the unethical behavior of cheating as it was not in his best interest.</u>
So, the correct answer is Motivated Blindness.
Men and Women were considered social equal in "Hunting and gathering" society.
