Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
Answer:
Explanation:
sorry but your question makes no sence
just so you know
Answer:
C) It incorrectly assumes that popularity equates to moral correctness.
Explanation:
A fallacy is an argument that is not correct but that might persuade people to believe it by appearing to be a good reasoning. According to this, the reasoning is fallacious in this statement because it incorrectly assumes that popularity equates to moral correctness. This is the answer because the statement indicates that as the reality is popular, it is not corrosive and decadent and this is an invalid argument because if a program is popular, this doesn't mean that it is morally correct. However, this may be an argument that people might believe.
If you don't know what your signing you might sign something bad and if you don't understand you can still sign something bad
The correrct option is C.
Tell the audience that this point will be important.
- "listen here"
- "listen closely"
- "this is important"
- "i want you hear this"
- etc.
All of these sayings are ways to call out this point before you say it to say that this is really important.
