We can best complete the sentence as "As an arbitrator, he felt that being methodical and requiring corroborating evidence from all participants was proper..."
<h3>How can we complete the sentence?</h3>
In order to complete this sentence, we must apply our knowledge of jargon typically used in the law field. The sentence provided in the question concerns an arbitrator who requires a certain type of evidence.
We can tell from reading the incomplete sentence that we will need a word that has a positive connotation to talk about the arbitrator, after all it is a job that demands certain positive qualities. Thus, we can eliminate options C and D.
Next, in order to talk about the evidence, we need to find a positive adjective to form a term or phrase that actually exists in law. Thus, we can eliminate options A and B.
We can conclude that the best option is letter D. It is good for an arbitrator to be methodical, which would mean he or she is doing everything correctly. Also, the term "corroborating evidence" is used to refer to evidence that confirms or supports other pieces of evidence.
With that in mind, we can conclude that the correct sentence would be:
As an arbitrator, he felt that being methodical and requiring corroborating evidence from all participants was proper procedure in dealing with conflicting accounts.
The complete question with the missing answer choices is the following:
As an arbitrator, he felt that being __________ and requiring __________ evidence from all participants was proper procedure in dealing with conflicting accounts.
- judicious... incompatible
- languorous ... interminable
- ambivalent ... manufactured
- methodical ... corroborating
Learn more about corroborating evidence here:
brainly.com/question/28216343
#SPJ1
