the arguments are not considered universally true, therefore these elements are key. They show how an assertion can be strengthened through its limitations.
Answer:
A. "But at the same time, we know that ultimately, we are the ones responsible for what our kids eat. We're responsible for how much time they spend on the couch with that remote control. While we might not always feel like it, when it comes to our kids' health and well-being, we're the ones in charge."
Explanation:
Just took test and got 100%
Direct: She was beautiful with golden brown hair and bright green eyes.
Indirect: He say me crying and he came up to me and gave me a hug.
Answer:
B). They were wealthy but generous, helping those less fortunate.
Explanation:
The 'Frankenstein' family is best described as the Bourgeoisie European family that has remained quite significant in European history. The famous character 'Victor Frankenstein' of the science fiction titled 'Frankenstein' is also historically rooted around this context.
As per the question, the 'Frankenstein family' was wealthy and possessed great fortune but despite belonging to the elite bourgeoisie class they were quite generous and helped those whom they found 'less fortunate' for a century. However, the family remained 'infamous' and used as 'synonymous' to 'monster' as their scientific experiment failed and went amiss(as in the novel Frankenstein). Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
<span>The option that best describes the purpose of "Justin Lebo" is to entertain readers with an inspirational story. Justin Lebo was a person who liked to fix bikes and make new ones out of old parts. What he also liked to do is help those in need who did not have nearly as much as he did. So he would make new bikes and give them to other children who would very much enjoy to ride them and be happy for a change.It is very inspirational and tells us that anyone can do even a small thing to help someone else.</span>
