Answer:
- width: 6.425 cm
- length: 22.488 cm
- height: 5.710 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to find dimensions of an open-top box of volume 825 cm³ such that cost of materials is minimized. The length relative to the width is specified, as are the costs of side and bottom materials.
<h2>Setup</h2><h3>Variables and dimensions</h3>
Let x represent the width of the base of the box. Then the length is 3.5x. The height is found from ...
V = LWH
H = V/(LW) = 825 cm³/(x(3.5x)) = 1650/(7x²)
So, the dimensions of the box are ...
- width: x
- length: 3.5x
- height: 1650/(7x²)
<h3>Cost of materials</h3>
The cost of materials for the base is $0.08/cm². The area of the base is the product of length and width.
base cost = $0.08 × LW = $0.08 × (3.5x³) = $0.28x²
The cost of materials for the sides is $0.07/cm². The total area of the sides of the box is the product of the height and the perimeter of the base.
side cost = $0.07 × (H)(2(L+W)) = $0.14(1650/(7x²)(x +3.5x) = 148.5/x
The total cost (y) is the sum of the base cost and the side cost. This is the value we want to minimize.
total cost = 0.28x² +148.5/x
<h2>Solution</h2><h3>Graph</h3>
A graph of the cost versus the width of the box is attached. It shows the minimum cost to be about $34.67 when the width of the box is 6.425 cm.
<h3>Dimensions</h3>
The remaining dimensions of the box are ...
length = 3.5(6.425 cm) = 22.488 cm
height = 1650/(7·6.425²) cm = 5.710 cm
width = 6.425 cm
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
You will find that the cost of the base is half the cost of the sides. This is the general solution to the problem, and can be used to find the exact dimensions without graphing or calculus.
Unfortunately, that fact cannot be shown definitively without using calculus.