1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
9

In Brown vs. Board of education of Topeka attorney Thurgood Marshall persuaded the court to overturn the separate but equal ruli

ng
True or False?
History
2 answers:
Allushta [10]3 years ago
7 0
In Brown vs. Board of education of Topeka attorney Thurgood Marshall persuaded the court to overturn the separate but equal ruling. At this case it was decided that there are no separate schools for white or black kids.

Your answer is: True 

Have an amazing day and stay hopeful!

slega [8]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is TRUE.

Brown v. Board of Education was a case dicussed by the US Supreme Court, which  led to the enactment of a landmark decision  in 1954.  

The case was about the constitutionality of the "separate but equal" principle that was accepted in a former decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated schools under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality, such education system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens by the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution.  

<u>Brown v. Board of Education overturned the abovementioned previous Supreme Court decision and declared segregation unconstitutional, claming that, in practice, it actually deprived black students.</u> The court published a deadline and all public schools nationwide had to abolish such practice and to adopt racial integration.

You might be interested in
A narrative essay is similar to writing which other type of literary piece?
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

C. Have a nice day.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did science of cartography came in India​
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

The cartography of India starts with early graphs for route and constructional plans for structures. Indian conventions impacted Tibetan and Islamic customs, and thusly, were affected by the British cartographers who set current ideas into India's guide making.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best summarizes the main issues surrounding the siege of the Alamo?
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

Sam Houston Elected

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
What key feature of europeanenaissance culture was?
frutty [35]
The cheap labor in the form of slaves. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did expansion make civil wars larger and more harmful?
    10·1 answer
  • Richard Nixon's diplomatic relations with China was mainly an attempt to
    6·2 answers
  • The period known as _____ focused on bringing the North and South back together again after the Civil War.
    14·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the establishment of local government
    9·2 answers
  • hi, i'm doing a political ideology presentation. the topics i want to talk about are..gun control, illegal immigration, and clim
    11·1 answer
  • "DIVERSE GROUPS AND CLASSES PARTICIPATED IN THE FREEDOM MOVEMENTS WITH VARIED ASPIRATIONS" JUSTIFY THE STATEMENT.
    6·1 answer
  • The _____ Party supported an income tax and a shorter work day.
    8·1 answer
  • Find your value amount (future value) $150/month for 18 years at 8%/ year compounded monthly
    6·1 answer
  • Where was hazrat isa born ?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which bill is Chisholm referring to?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!