1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
5

Assume you live in a country with a command economy. In a paragraph of 125 words, describe how this economic system might affect

your life.
History
2 answers:
Juliette [100K]3 years ago
8 0
This economic system might affect your life because you might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. For example, the state owned companies produce things that the state needs, if it doesn't need it then it doesn't produce it. If you, for example, want to buy a gaming console, there is a chance that it might not be available because the country wouldn't be manufacturing it since it's not something necessary.
Mamont248 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also  might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The branches of the state government are established by
Andru [333]
All state governments are modeled after the federal government and consist of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all states uphold a "republican form" of government, although the three-branch structure is not required.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
17. What assumption is made with supply-side economics? A. Increased federal spending will slow inflation, bringing prices down.
topjm [15]
The answer to the question is letter D. <span>Tax cuts will stimulate the economy, eventually bringing in more tax revenue.
</span><span>
The increased government revenue from a faster-growing economy would be enough to compensate completely for the short-term costs of a tax cut, and that tax cuts could cause overall revenue to increase( that's a fact).</span><span>
Some advocates of the supply-side economics claim that  tax cuts ultimately led to an overall increase in governmental revenue due to stronger economic growth.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What caused conflict between various groups of people in the west
Gelneren [198K]
<span>At the core of most intractable conflicts are deeply rooted divisions affecting parties' fundamental interests, needs and values. These include irreconcilable moral values, matters of justice and human rights, high-stakes distributional issues, unmet human needs, and issues of identity. Such conflicts tend to be protracted and have very damaging effects.IntroductionIntractable conflicts are ones that remain unresolved for long periods of time and then become stuck at a high level of intensity and destructiveness. They typically involve many parties and concern an intricate set of historical, religious, cultural, political, and economic issues.[1] These matters are central to human social existence and typically resist any attempts at resolution. In fact, parties often refuse to negotiate or compromise with respect to such issues. As a result, each side views the rigid position of the other as a threat to its very existence. They may develop a mutual fear of each other and a profound desire to inflict as much physical and psychological harm on each other as possible.[2] This sense of threat and hostility often pervades the everyday lives of the parties involved and overrides their ability to recognize any shared concerns they might have.<span>


Additional insights into the underlying causes of intractable conflicts are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.</span>As conflict escalates, any tangible issues may become embedded within a larger set of values, beliefs, identities, and cultures. Disputes about land, money, or other resources may take on increased symbolic significance.[3] Over the course of conflict, the original issues can even become irrelevant as new causes for conflict are generated by actions within the conflict itself. Those on opposing sides come to view each other as enemies and may resort to highly destructive means. Eventually, the parties become unable to separate different issues and may see no way out of the conflict other than through total victory or defeat.[4]Why do some conflicts become intractable? Many describe intractability in terms of the destructive relationship dynamics that govern the adversaries' interaction. For example, if one party resorts to inhumane treatment in waging conflict, this deepens antagonism and may lead the opposing side to seek revenge.[5] Likewise, when extremist political leaders appeal to ethno-nationalist ideology to arouse fear, this may increase support for the use of violence and contribute to intractability. Other factors that make some conflicts extremely difficult to resolve include the vast numbers of people involved, the large number of complex issues to be resolved, and a previous history of violent confrontation. But what are the underlying causes of these destructive conflict dynamics?What is common to all intractable conflicts is that they involve interests or values that the disputants regard as critical to their survival. These underlying causes include parties' moral values, identities, and fundamental human needs. Because conflicts grounded in these issues involve the basic molds for thought and action within given communities and culture, they are usually not resolvable by negotiation or compromise.[6] This is because the problem in question is one that cannot be resolved in a win-win way. If one value system is followed, another is threatened. If one nation controls a piece of land, another does not. If one group is dominant, another is subordinate.While sharing is possible in theory, contending sides usually regard compromise as a loss. This is especially true in societies where natural fear and hatred is so ingrained that opposing groups cannot imagine living with or working cooperatively with the other side. Instead, they are often willing to take whatever means necessary to ensure group survival and protect their way of life. Below are brief summaries of some of the central underlying causes of intractable conflict.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Under clays American system the factories protected by the tarried would run at a profit and employ
fgiga [73]
The Urban Population. The factories protected by the tariff would run at a profit and employ the urban population. The city dwellers would constitute an increased market for agricultural products and would manufacture goods for use in farming regions. The farms would supply raw materials to the factories and food to a growing urban population. Clay’s American plan was rejected, but Congress was able to pass protective tariff.
6 0
3 years ago
Famous for his idea on the treatment of mental disorders and the use of psychoanalysis
AURORKA [14]

Answer:

freud?

Explanation:

im ot 100% sure sorry!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • One of the main reasons for the decline of the kingdom of axum was a shift in trade routes to the arabian peninsula and persian
    12·1 answer
  • how did islamic philosophical thought shape the philosophical underpinnings of thomas aquinas' theology
    8·1 answer
  • The French philosopher Baron de Montesquieu believed that the power of a government
    10·2 answers
  • For many years after the missouri compromise, political parties:
    11·2 answers
  • What was the immediate effect of the September 11th attacks on US airlines?
    15·2 answers
  • What brought the female pilots together and what kept them toghter
    5·1 answer
  • George Mason had the most influence on-
    7·1 answer
  • How is Duties and Smuggling related??
    5·1 answer
  • which early Spanish Settler wrote disapprovingly of the treatment of the native Americans in new Spain
    8·1 answer
  • People left their homelands and came to Minnesota for many reasons. Fill in as many as you can.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!