Answer:
The answer is: A) the secondary market; prospectus
Explanation:
Secondary market refers to the stock exchange where investors buy and sell securities that they already possess. The secondary market is what most people think about when they refer to a stock market. A primary market only sells stocks that are being issued for the first time, like an IPO.
The prospectus of a company is a legal document provided by public companies or mutual funds that include information about the company's strategies, financial statements and top management's background.
Answer:
It need sales figure of 22,125 units per year to break even considering their currnent contribution marign and fixed cost.
Explanation:
fixed cost per year:
equipment lease cost: 288,000
other overhead cost <u> 48,300 </u>
total fixed cost 336,300
contribution per unit:
sales revenue - variable cost
39.75 - 14.55 = 15.20
each units generates $15.20 dollar we need to save up for 336,300 dollars
break even point:
336,300 / 15.20 = 22,125 units
Answer:
$3.62
Explanation:
Dividend Yield = 0.12/2
Dividend Yield = 0.06
==> (Dividend in One Year)/Current Price= .045
D1 = 0.06*$64
D1 = $3.84
D0 (Current Dividend) = D1/(1+Dividend Yield)
D0 (Current Dividend) = $3.84/(1.06)
D0 (Current Dividend) = 3.622641509433962
D0 (Current Dividend) = $3.62
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option B (Wheel) is the right answer.
Explanation:
- That was the most suited wheel-based networking architecture. So every team works reasonably amongst the many departments together, communicated as well as worked together as a centralized control through hubs.
- Instead, every crew here works alone and is interconnected to the hub so that it wouldn't immediately impact the activities of some other groups.
The other four alternatives aren't connected to the given scenario. So the above is the right option.