Question

The New York Times first reported on the Tulsa Massacre on June 2, 1921. Start by looking at the headline from that day: “85 Whites and Negroes Die in Tulsa Riots as 3,000 Armed Men Battle in Streets” (PDF). What do you notice about the language and framing of what happened as it is articulated in the headline? If you were reading the paper in 1921, what would you have first assumed happened?

Answer 1

The thing that can be easily noticed in the headline based on the language and framing of what happened as it is articulated in the headline is that they were deeply racist.

This is because they used the word "negro", a condescending and racist term to describe a black man that died in a riot, but in that period of history in 1921, this was considered to be normal, as there was racial segregation of a very high magnitude,

What is Racial Segregation?

This refers to discrimination that is targeted at an ethnicity or group of people based on their race and skin color.

Hence, we can see that The thing that can be easily noticed in the headline based on the language and framing of what happened as it is articulated in the headline is that they were deeply racist.

This is because they used the word "negro", a condescending and racist term to describe a black man that died in a riot, but in that period of history in 1921, this was considered to be normal, as there was racial segregation of a very high magnitude,

Read more about racial segregation here:

brainly.com/question/19908071

#SPJ1