A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
<em>Hello Tia!</em>
<em>I choose Core and nation of Islam</em>
<em></em>
<em>The fundamental similarity between the two groups is that the all fought for an end to racism and inequality. however there was fundamental difference in their approach and strategy.</em>
<em>the nation of Islam viewed the white man as a devil, and advocated for a militant approach to racism and the actions of racist group such as Klan. The most prominent leader of the nation of Islam movement was Malcolm X, who presumably converted to Islam,took over the ideal of the group but broke from it later.The movement also called for separation of races.</em>
<em></em>
<em>On the other hand,the Core, also known as Congress of racial equality advocated for peaceful protests,and integration of all races. some of the prominent members were James L. Farmer, Jr., George Houser, James R. Robinson, Homer Jack, and Joe Guinn. </em>
<em />
Answer:
The Iron Curtain was not actually a physical wall in most places, but it separated the communist and capitalist countries. The Berlin wall on the other hand was actually a wall that was built right through the middle of Berlin the capital of Germany.
Explanation:
Fresh change creates new opportunities An promises it gives the people something to work towards.
To me I thought it was a savanna because to me it sounds as if it was in Africa so yea I'm going to say it was a savanna.
