Answer:
After its independence in the year 1980, Zimbabwe made Robert Mugabe as its president. But after that only Robert won the elections that were held.
It is said that he used several unfair means during elections to win and also he practiced some practices which can be called as non-democratic:
Explanation:
1) he suppressed the opposition party and many times interrupted their meetings.
2) even control the media and newspapers and whoever opposed his government or his policies was tortured.
3) the most important thing that leads to considering Mugabe's government as non-democratic was that he didn't considered the verdicts of judiciary and didn't abide by them.
No matter how powerful Prime Minister is what he has no right to suppress the media and opposition party neither he has any right to dismiss the context of judiciary. So, these things are sufficient to consider his government as non democratic.
_________________________________________________
❂✨Answered By CaliPure ✨❂
❉ Brainliest Would Be Appreciated❉
✯If You Have Questions Ask In the Chat Box✯
Answer:
A neutral country is a state that is neutral towards belligerents in a specific war or holds itself as permanently neutral in all future conflicts (including avoiding entering into military alliances such as NATO). As a type of non-combatant status, nationals of neutral countries enjoy protection under the law of war from belligerent actions to a greater extent than other non-combatants such as enemy civilians and prisoners of war.
Different countries interpret their neutrality differently:[1] some, such as Costa Rica, have demilitarized, while Switzerland holds to "armed neutrality" to deter aggression with a sizeable military while barring itself from foreign deployment. However, not all neutral countries avoid any foreign deployment or alliances, as Austria, Ireland, Finland and Sweden have active UN peacekeeping forces and a political alliance within the European Union. The traditional Swedish policy is not to participate in military alliances, with the intention of staying neutral in the case of war. Immediately before World War II, the Nordic countries stated their neutralit but Sweden changed its position to that of non-belligerent at the start of the Winter War.
There have been considerable changes to the interpretation of neutral conduct over the past centuries.[2] During the Cold War another European country, Yugoslavia, claimed military and ideological neutrality, and that is continued by its successor, Serbia.[3]
Answer: DIVERSITY is the perceived differents among people: age, functional specialty, profession, geographic origin, lifestyle, tenure with the organization, or position, and any other perceived differences
Explanation: diversity explains how people staying together as a group or in a social organization are different from each other, this helps to distinguish everyone according to the relation we choose to use. For instance in an organization were we need the Hispanic to conduct a particular task, diversity helps to differentiate them.
Diversity can also be seen among people of the same culture, because they may not be of the same ages. Diversity can also be seen among people of the same culture and age, because they may not be of the same family or the same height.
Answer:
Some of its requirements forced them to abandon their traditional practices, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Indian Reorganization Act is also known as the Wheeler-Howard Act. Enacted on 18th June 1934, this act was a federal law of the United States which dealt with the status of the American Indians. The main goal of this Act was to modify the traditional goal of adaptation of Indians into the society of Americans and to encourage, promote and preserve the tribes and their traditional values and culture.
However, this act was rejected by many native American tribes on the grounds that some of its provisions forced them to evacuate their traditional customs.
This process is called impeachment. I hope this helps :)
