C is your answer to the question
The statements referred by the question are:
a) It convinced the United States to dismantle its nuclear weapons.
b) It proved that a naval blockade was not an act of war.
c) It showed Cuba that communism should be stopped.
d) It brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The correct statement is D. Historians agree the Missile Crisis was the closest the world got to have a nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR. Nothing before or after this came as close to be direct aggression from one of these countries against the other.
Statements A and C never happened: the U.S. has nuclear weapons until today, and Cuba didn't give up on communism.
Statement B doesn't fit the facts around the Missile Crisis. The naval blockade didn't lead to war only because the U.S. was defensive.
Answer:
Sí, considero que Puerto Rico es uno de esos países, ya que es un territorio no incorporado de Estados Unidos,y también las Islas Vírgenes de los Estados Unidos, que es hoy en día considerada una colonia.
Explanation:
El objetivo de la enmienda era el de otorgar poderes extraordinarios al Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de América sobre la soberanía de Cuba.
Por lo tanto, existe directa o indirectamente una forma de dominación similar.
1. Separation of powers is having separate branches of government to make sure that there is not one big powerful government.
2. Our government is divided into the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
3. The ideas in the preamble are basically how the government is there for the people. When the government becomes too destructive, the people have the right to abolish it and create a new government. The decision to end the current government is not an easy one, and there should be clear reasons why. But when there is a long history of abuse of power, it is the peoples' right and duty to essentially fire the government. So, separating the powers of government would prevent the government from becoming too destructive.<span>
</span>
