Answer:
human shape
Explanation:
The Laputans, though they are in human shape, are more obviously allegorical creatures than any in Gulliver’s Travels. Their physical characteristics certainly express their nature as do those of the Brobdingnagians or the Yahoos, but in a different way.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"I'm Nobody! Who are you? How does the speaker use diction and figurative language to portray what it’s like to be a “Somebody” and how does this impact the meaning of the text? Cite evidence from the poem to support your answer.
"
Answer:
The poem "Im nobody, who are you?" was written by Emily Dickinson. The author used the diction to highlight the difference in the concepts brought by the words "nobody" and "someone", in addition to highlighting the meaning of these words in people's lives. Figurative language was used as a way of showing comparisons between real life situations and the need to be something substantial and important.
Explanation:
The diction within the literature refers to the choice of vocabulary that the author of a work decided to use to express the intended message through the text. In the case of Emily Dickinson's poem, the diction was designed to show how "being nobody" brings a bad feeling and "being someone" brings a good feeling, however it is better to be nobody than someone, because to be nobody gives you privacy and company .
Figurative language, on the other hand, represents a literary artifice where a word or expression is used to refer to something other than what it means. In the poem quoted above, the figurative language can be perceived when the author compares the need to be important with the uncomfortable noise made by the frog.
<span>Using the APA guidelines, the correct answer among the
choices is the 1st one which is:</span>
<span>Stolley, Karl and Allen Brizee. "Is It Plagiarism
Yet?" The Owl at Purdue. Purdue U Online Writing Lab, 21 Apr. 2010. Web.
11 Jan. 2012.</span>
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Boxer values hard work, while napoleon values power and success
