The message of the campaign contains the ideas that the candidate wants to share with the voters. It is to get those who agree with their ideas to support them when running for a political position. The message often consists of several talking points about policy issues. The points summarize the main ideas of the campaign and are repeated frequently in order to create a lasting impression with the voters. In many elections, the opposition party will try to get the candidate "off message" by bringing up policy or personal questions that are not related to the talking points. Most campaigns prefer to keep the message broad in order to attract the most potential voters. A message that is too narrow can alienate voters or slow the candidate down with explaining details. For example, in the 2008 American presidential election John McCain originally used a message that focused on his patriotism and political experience: "Country First"; later the message was changed to shift attention to his role as "The Original Maverick" within the political establishment. Barack Obama ran on a consistent, simple message of "change" throughout his campaign.
Delaware: December 7, 1787.
Pennsylvania: December 12, 1787.
New Jersey: December 18, 1787.
Connecticut: January 9, 1788.
Massachusetts: February 6, 1788.
Maryland: April 28, 1788.
New Hampshire: June 21, 1788.
New York: July 26, 1788.
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
The statistical syllogism is also called a non-deductive syllogism. This process argues in using the inductive reasoning for generalization. It is true for a particular case.
This procedure used the syllogism like most, frequently and never and rarely. It has its statistical generalizations it has one or two premises.
Premises is a generalization and argument that is used to conclude the generalization. Premises can be true and the conclusion can be wrong but it happened rarely.
Thus Zia has used here statistical syllogism for different subjects.
European democracies have more parties in positions of political power than does the United States because of their reliance on proportional representation.
<h3>How do American political parties compare with political parties in Europe?</h3>
The main difference between American and European political parties is that with the primacy of the Parliamentary system in Europe (vs the Presidential system in the USA), Europe has a much larger number of viable parties in each country.
<h3>Why are political parties important in democracy?</h3>
Political parties and elections play an important role in the analysis of politics in developing countries, particularly in the analysis of democratization, and specifically the consolidation of democratic political regimes.
Learn more about political parties in Europe here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/1372675</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer: Property rights
Explanation:
Property rights are theoretical socially-enforced constructs in economics for determining how a resource or economic good is used and owned. Resources can be owned by (and hence be the property of) individuals, associations, collectives, or governments. Property rights can be viewed as an attribute of an economic good. This attribute has four broad components and is often referred to as a bundle of rights:
- the right to use the good
- the right to earn income from the good
- the right to transfer the good to others, alter it, abandon it, or destroy it (the right to ownership cessation)
- the right to enforce property rights