Answer:
will succeed, will reevaluate, and will create
Explanation:
Answer:
the author used the terms to help understand the trip of Juno by using detales of the trip. he/she explaine what safe mode was and why juno went into safe mode. she/he had also explaned what a fly-by was.
Explanation:
Some tips to follow to write this informal letter are:
- Address of the sender and receiver (if the receiver is abroad)
- Salutation
- Body of the letter telling your friend your travel plans
- State why you would want to travel
- Mention the purpose for your travel and your preferred destination
- Conclusion
<h3>What is an Informal Letter?</h3>
This refers to the type of letter that is written to a close friend or associate and uses an informal tone.
Hence, based on the fact that the letter is an informal one, you are allowed to joke around, but remember why you are writing this letter and state it.
Read more about informal letters here:
brainly.com/question/18879087
#SPJ1
To write an impressive internship resume, these six steps will guide you:
- Consult your network by talking to professors, friends, family and advisors who can hep you can help you build a plan.
- Write a strong impressive objective statement.
- Lead with your strongest asset which is your educational asset to set you apart.
- Include any work experience you have, even a part time job is useful to show demonstrate your strong work ethics.
- Include your achievement section talking about awards you have gotten or project you have done.
- Keep it simple to one page and include extracurricular activities if they are related to the internship you are applying for.
<h3>What is an internship resume?</h3>
This is known as a document created and used by a person focusing primarily on their skills, education and strength since there are no extensive work experience to show.
Hence, we can see that to make your resume stand out, you should avoid filler words, mention volunteer jobs,include hobby and interest sections and use concrete data and examples.
Read more about <em>resume</em> here:
brainly.com/question/14218463
#SPJ1
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
