Answer:
<u>When making an outline, it is a good practice to:</u>
- Put the main idea in the title
- Have one main topic that does not relate to the title
- Strive for 3-5 major components
- Move single sub point to larger groups
- Allow sub points to overlap.
- Combine sub points whenever possible
Answer:
Option 1 is more convenient.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The annual salary is $100,000. You are offered two options for a severance package. Option 1 pays you 6 months' salary now. Option 2 pays you and your heirs $6,000 per year forever
The present value of option 1 is:
PV= 6*100,000= $600,000
To calculate the present value of option 2 we need to use the present value formula of a perpetual annuity:
PV= Cash flow/i
PV= 6,000/0.11= $54,545
There is no doubt that option 1 is better.
Answer:
B- Attempt to restrict output in order to raise prices.
Explanation:
Cartels is similar to a group in which every member is a giant producer together they control how much product will go in the market or how much price would be charged.
<em>So</em> the basic aim of cartels is to control the prices and to achieve that there are various methods they can use, one of these methods is: They will stop the product create a shortage, and then increase up the charges.
Answer:
The expected return on the portfolio is:
16.75%
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Company A Company B Total
Investment $3,500 $6,500 $10,000
Expected returns 20% 15%
Expected returns ($) $700 $975 $1,675
Expected return on
portfolio = $1,675/$10,000 * 100 = $16.75%
b) The expected return on the portfolio is calculated as the returns on the portfolio in dollars divided by the total investment in the two companies, multiplied by 100. This gives a value in percentage terms.
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
