1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
2 years ago
14

Look at this thesaurus entry:

World Languages
1 answer:
slega [8]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I think a thought is suitable answer.

You might be interested in
What does feminism mean to you and how does gender inequality happens between men and women?
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Being a feminist means that you fight for the equality of all people

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
3. the first amendment to the constitution prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. the litu
Dimas [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The 1st Amendment states, quote:

<em> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...</em>

Now, this may be seen as the government not being able to interfere with banning the practice of human sacrifice. However, based on <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878), The Supreme Court ruled that religious duty is not a defense against criminal indictment.

On top of that, human sacrifice in the modern world is deemed as a murder, as the victim is typically not consenting. If, however, they are, it may still be deemed as manslaughter. Under <em>Section 18 of the US Code 1111</em>, Murder is defined as, quote <em>the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought... or premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect death of any human being other than him who is killed</em>. (Section a, Section 18, U.S. Code 1111).

Within the religious liberties that are protected by federal law, it is stated under <em>Executive Order 13798 </em>(82 FR 21675 - Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty). The most important part to look at from this order is section 2, which states that <em>The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance from one's religious beliefs</em>, and in section 10, which states that the given act <em>prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening any aspect of religious observance or practice, </em><em>unless imposition of that burden on a particular religious adherent satisfies strict scrutiny. </em> (Emphasis added, Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, RFRA 1993). In this case, the scrutiny is satisfied as the religious practice breaks US Code 1111 Section 18, as stated above. Therefore, <em>the government can be allowed to interfere with this particular practice. </em>

<u>Laws & rights in use in this case, as well as court decisions:</u>

- 1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution

- <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878) - Chief Justice Morrison Waite.

- Section 18, US Code 1111

- Executive Order 13798

- Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom Restoration act, 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Learn more about Religious Freedom, here:

brainly.com/question/4773712 - Freedom of religious worship is guaranteed by...

<em />

3 0
2 years ago
Question 1 with 1 blank: Si quieres comer en mi casa / (tú / llamarme) [command] Question 2 with 1 blank: Si Luisa se enferma /
AveGali [126]

Answer:

1) llámame, 2) su novio la lleva al doctor, 3) el gobierno va a ser mejor, 4) ustedes aprobarán el examen, 4) nosotras no vamos a llegar al discurso.

Explanation:

1) Si quieres comer en mi casa, <em>llámame</em>.

2) Si Luisa se enferma, <em>su novio la lleva al doctor</em>.

3) Si todos los ciudadanos votan, <em>el gobierno va a ser mejor</em>.

4) Si Ana y tú estudian, <em>ustedes aprobarán el examen</em>.

5) Si nos levantamos tarde, <em>nosotras no vamos a llegar al discurso</em>.

7 0
3 years ago
Which is not an example of effective usage and interpretation of verbal messages?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

C. reading an assigned passage

Explanation:

According to the question, the option that is not an example of effective usage and interpretation of verbal messages is option C because reading an assigned passage is not an interpretation of a verbal message.

Notice that the other three options are all interpreting a verbal message that has been said by someone, while option C is not.

4 0
4 years ago
What is the difference between the two types of experimental research design​
Temka [501]

Answer:

In a true experiment, participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment or the control group, whereas they are not assigned randomly in a quasi-experiment. ... Quasi-experimental research designs do not randomly assign participants to treatment or control groups for comparison.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I've read that Hong Kong and Taiwan use traditional. Does all the other places use simplified then?
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP 80 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • Provide a quotation from the text to support your answers. the open boat
    11·1 answer
  • where are Ponyboy and Cherry when Ponyboy begin to tell the story of Johnny what are they talking about
    9·1 answer
  • You've been assigned a research paper on the possible role of gender in playground behaviour ,and you're unsure where to begin y
    5·2 answers
  • Reduce the sentence by using more conceited words
    11·2 answers
  • What is the answer for this worksheet?<br> french!
    14·1 answer
  • Which best explains the term implied metaphor? A. A metaphor that compares two things that are already very similar B. A metapho
    10·1 answer
  • Ready
    5·1 answer
  • Hungry for experience translate to tagalog​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!