The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
<span>In recent years white prejudice has increased in rural parts of the US, while in more densely-populated urban areas white prejudice has declined. Studies show that simply by moving to a move urban and racially diverse city, white people become less likely to prejudge others based on race. This suggests that racism is perhaps due to lack of exposure to people of other races and is a form of experiential ignorance. The reasons for white prejudice seem to be caused mostly by the spread of misinformation and hate speech, where white supremacist figureheads will blame any number of problems on any race or group that they perceive as "other" or "outsiders". The internet has given these outspoken individuals an international soapbox from which to spout their racist rhetoric, which may have caused an increase in the intensity of believe seen among some groups of white prejudiced Americans. However, the internet has also given a platform for many more rational thinkers who preach tolerance, acceptance, and the value of diversity in society. This is considered mainstream academic thought in the US today, which was not the case just 50 years ago. In that regard, white prejudice has decreased as a function of the overall population of the US. Similar trends have been observed in other countries which were previously predominantly white and have recently seen a much larger spike in racial and ethnic diversity. For example, in Germany, white prejudice has starkly decreased over the past 100 years. Less than a century ago, a large number of Germans were participating in race-based genocide on their own soil. Today, Germany has a culture of acceptance and semi-open borders. In 2016, Germany's leader Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to thousands of refugees escaping Syria. The majority of these refugees were non-white, and were accepted by the German people. This scenario would not have been possible in German culture 50 years ago.</span>
If this is true/false, then the answer is true.
Answer:
Either cancel the party or invite a small group of friends only.
Explanation:
Cindy is an adult, so in theory, she can throw any party she wants. But she still lives in her parents' house and this has to be taken into consideration, they have a reputation to lose if something goes wrong.
The best decision would be to change the arrangements for the party: instead of inviting random people (which is crazy and dangerous given the amount of alcohol in house), she should invite only a group of trusted friends. This way the safety of them is guaranteed as they know each other. If it is too late to change anything because people are expecting the party to take place, she could cancel it due to a problem ( lack of parents' permission for example) or not let all the people into her house. If they insist, she should call the police.
Throwing a huge party with strangers is insane, they would get drunk, destroy the house, bother the neighbors and behave in improper manners.
