The answer would be the first choice or A. "Original ideas that are <em>not</em> your own."
Any piece of information that does not belong to you would require a citation, otherwise it would be considered <em>plagiarism. </em>B and C are incorrect because both of those things belong to you, and therefore don't require citation. D is also incorrect because a general fact doesn't belong to any one person. For example, if you wanted to include the information that dogs can't eat chocolate, that wouldn't require a citation because that is general knowledge that most people are aware of.
Answer:
Woolf enjoyed reading, attending
discussions, and taking walks
Parallel structure
Art and science are branches of
river
Understatement
We are asking for donations for
play. Don't be a Scrooge!
Allusion
Virginia Woolf and Henrik Ibser
little things.
Metaphor
Many students need loans for
long will it take before we act?
Rhetorical question
Explanation:
A rhetorical question is a question that has no answer. It is usually used for dramatic effect.
An understatement means representing something as being less important than its true value.
Metaphor is a figure of speech that describes or compares two things in a way that is not literally applicable
Allusion is an indirect reference to someone or something
Parallel structure is using the same pattern of words to show that different ideas are equally important.
There are many valid points in Orwell's essay with which we agree. The main points relating to politics and English language are follows,
I agree that the people are now paying less attention to the grammar of English, people are finding ways to simplify the daily communication.
They paying less attention to the grammar makes English look a different language than what it was initially.
I disagree when Orwell's when he writes about the meaning less words, he explains that some words used in stories are meaning less to the reader, while as a story book reader fan I think that each word or set of words ease the imaging of story.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24374672
I reasd this book, and took the test last year its A.
Answer: Sanger Rainsford with the love of hunting, used to chasing wild diversion. By the time he was stranded in Zaroff's island, he stops to be a hunter and turns into the hunted. This change everything that Rainsford knew before. He couldn't believe that he will become a prey his entire life. Rainsford swings to his own particular chasing abilities as ingrained instincts. He starts to acquire gratefulness for the equivocation of the creatures he hunted, and what the hunt is about from both viewpoints. Particularly when he begins turning the tables on General Zaroff. At the point when Rainsford, in the end, wins the "diversion," he is just about finished with "amusement" chasing.
Explanation:
