Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
I believe it would be <span>long-term Consideration.
Long-term consideration refers to the type of consideration that made in order to determine the actions to ensure the continued success of the group in the future.
</span><span>money people and materials available would determine the amount of consumption that the group can afford to use, and the number of goods/wealth that it could generate in the future.</span>
Answer:
Cabeza de vaca is my opinion.
<span>No, the process of judicial review is limited to specific cases and controversies per the Constitution.</span>
Answer:
It only works when a dictator comes to power and convinces the people that only they will bring safety and prestige to the country.