1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
2 years ago
10

Read the quotes in the "Author's Disclosure" section of this book that help to describe the

English
1 answer:
NNADVOKAT [17]2 years ago
5 0

The quotes All men have certain natural rights which are "inalienable" in the "Author's Disclosure" section of this book that help to describe the Juris Naturalist viewpoint. The definition of "unalienable" is fundamental natural rights that are "life, liberty, and property."

Because the quote All men have certain natural rights which are "inalienable" in the "Author's Disclosure" section of this book, which helps to describe the Juris Naturalist viewpoint. The definition of "unalienable" is that all people, according to Locke, are equal because they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights.

That is, rights that were bestowed by God and are inalienable. "Life, liberty, and property," according to Locke, are three of these essential inherent rights. Unalienable things cannot be denied or taken away. The Declaration of Independence, which states that humans have the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is where the phrase is most famously used.

We may examine the Latin term alienus, which means "of or belonging to another," to learn the word's unalienable etymology. Our term is formed by the prefix un-, which stands for the phrase "not," and the suffix -able, which stands for the concept of potential. As a result, we are "unable to be refused." Oh, and in case you were curious about the debate over whether it is "unalienable" or "inalienable," both terms are acceptable.

To know more about inalienable:

brainly.com/question/11013022

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Part A
Brut [27]

Answer:

Part A= D

Part B= B

Explanation:

Just took the test!

4 0
4 years ago
A sentence for abduct
Alexandra [31]

Aliens abduct cows and people into their spaceships

Or the kindnapper will abduct the little girl if no one is watching out for him

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help meeeee !!!!! explain how 20th century poetry developed over time? Include specific movements of poetry and the peopl
sergey [27]

Answer:

I No sé poesía, pero lo explicaré, fue aterrador, muy solo, murieron más de 3 millones de personas.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains how the elements in the photograph add to the message?
ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

B: The image of a car part in one of the young man’s hands and a cigarette in the other shows the contrast between being smart and foolish.

Explanation:

I just took the test on edge

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will mark brainliest!! Please helpppp!!
Aleks [24]

Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize stands in front of a room full of important government people; he wants his audience to recognize that being indifferent is not the same as being innocent – indifference, “after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred”.

He forces the listeners to wonder which kind of people they are. To him, during the Holocaust, people fit into one of “three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” and he forces the bystanders to decide whether or not to stay indifferent to the actual situation. He takes the time to list various actual civil wars and humanitarian crises (line 17 of his speech) and contrast them with WWII.

He makes sure that his audience realise what is at stake “Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment” [for mankind]. He wants the audience to be really affected by what they hear – so he talks to them in their condition of human being: “Is it necessary at times to practice [indifference] simply to … enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine”. And he also talks to them as government people with their duty and the power they have over the actual conflicts. He wants them to compare themselves with their predecessors during WWII: “We believed that the leaders of the free world did not know what was going on … And now we knew, we learned, we discovered that the Pentagon knew, the State Department knew.”

Wiesel finishes his speech by expressing hope for the new millennium. We believed he addresses these final words to those who will refuse to stay indifferent. But it seems that Wiesel would count them in the minority: “Some of them -- so many of them -- could be saved.” probably refers to this minority.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read Richard’s personal narrative.
    11·2 answers
  • What are the conditions like in the railcars the Jews take to the concentration camps? Question 1 options:
    15·1 answer
  • Question 1. Part A: Which of the following best describes a theme of the story? *
    12·1 answer
  • A strand of mRNA has the bases guanine-cytosine-uracil. Which amino acid
    7·1 answer
  • Which phrase became synonymous with the research Stanley Milgram conducted on "the small world phenomenon"?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help the story is “the story of my life” by Hellen Keller
    9·1 answer
  • Which theme does the subplot about Boo Radley reinforce?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain what an opportunity is and give an example.
    14·1 answer
  • 13. How often go swimming?<br> your kids sometimes<br> b. do your kids like<br> c. do your kids
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Which choice best describes the presentation of the text?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!