Question

. Paul is arrested for insider trading; this is the illegal practice of trading on the stock market to make money with confidential information. Paul is sentenced to 15 years in prison, which is a fairly typical punishment for this crime. Paul has been in prison for 14 years and is nearing his release; a new judge has to grant his official release, but believes the earlier judge was too light on his punishment. He rules that Paul also has to pay a fine of $500,000. What amendment might Paul argue
was just violated? Why

Answer 1

The amendment that Paul can say has been violated here would be the 5th amendment.

What is the 5th amendment?

This is the amendment of the nation that states that the people of the nation would not have to held or made to answer for any capital or infamous crime except the indictment that they are being kept with is through that of a grand jury. Hence we can see that Paul is being kept illegally by the court.

Now from the case that we have being presented with we can see that the new judge is trying to subject the person of Paul two times to an offense that he committed which is illegal.

Read more on the eight amendment here

brainly.com/question/18716562

#SPJ1