Explanation:
The Rev. Dr Martin Luther King as so important because he came to symbolise the Civil Rights movement. He did not invent it, and he was not the only leader in it - but he captured the public imagination more than anyone else. Such things as the “I Have A Dream” speech may have been taken (almost word for word) from other Civil Rights speakers (just as his doctoral thesis was actually the work of another person) - but it was the way he delivered a speech and the time-and-place that was important. In the 1960s if people had heard of only one Civil Rights leader it was Martin Luther King. Without in any way being insulting , he was a “showman” - and it was GOOD that he was a showman. A quiet academic theologian would not have got any public attention or been able to inspire a mass movement.
Yes his private conduct left a lot to be desired (and which of us is without sin?) and his political opinions tended to go into some strange places in the 1960s - but the basic point remains. Was Segregation a great moral evil? Yes it was. Who did more than any other person to campaign against it? To turn the public against it? Martin Luther King was that person.
Answer:
chart or bar graph is a chart or graph that presents categorical data with rectangular bars with heights or lengths proportional to the values that they represent. The bars can be plotted vertically or horizontally. A vertical bar chart is sometimes called a column chart.
Explanation:
hope it will help you
The correct answer is: C) increasing its role in the lives of citizens.
Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced <em>keynesian economic theory</em> with the launching of the New Deal policies in three waves from 1933 to 1939 to provide relief to farmers and jobs to the unemployed. He ended Great Depression by stimulating consumer demand through government spending.
Most state income taxes<span> have a similar </span>progressive structure<span>. A </span>regressive tax<span> is the exact opposite. Higher-income taxpayers pay a smaller percentage </span>of<span> their income than lower-income taxpayers because the </span>tax<span> is not based on ability to pay.</span>