The idea is to change the expression "that kept" to "that keeps" to keep the sentence written in standard English.
<h3>Why should this be done?</h3>
- Because the expression "that kept" refers to the word "fur."
- Because the word "fur" refers to the pronoun "it."
- Because the verb "to keep" when conjugated with the pronoun "it" or related words, should take the form "keeps."
Standard English refers to its most formal and grammatically correct form. Therefore, all verbs, pronouns, and nouns must be added to sentences in their correct forms, using all rules of grammar and syntax.
Furthermore, it is necessary to abandon the use of language vices and colloquialism that are common in informal English but incorrect in standard English.
Learn more about standard English:
brainly.com/question/27753875
#SPJ1
Answer:
(for you)
My GPA Goal is a 4.0. I want to reach this goal because I can get into ivy league schools. This has always been my dream. I want to get into a good college and highschool so i can become a _______. (ex. doctor,lawyer etc..)
Acheiving this goal would be a dream come true.
:)
Answer:
B.
Weighing perhaps 250 pounds, the police bulletin said the suspect was a large man with very <u>large</u> ears.
Explanation:
Modifiers in a sentence is said to be when an adverb or an adjective is used in a phrase, clause or in-order to give more clarity to a given sentence.
This modifier goes a long way to make sure that the meaning behind the sentence is clarified. <em>For example, He went to the 5 star restaurant to have a </em><em><u>vegetarian</u></em><em> meal. </em>The word, <u>Vegetarian</u> is the modifier to<u> meal.</u>
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
Answer:
C. wanted
Explanation:
Replacing wanted with something like "was forced" would give the sentence a negative connotation, and the rest of the options are essential to basic information the sentence provides.
