Perennializes emphasize the enduring nature of goals, curriculum, and techniques. This contradicts a key psychological principle. As a result, it cannot be justified in terms of 'psychology.' It is completely psychological.
Next, the terms "absolute," "perennial virtue," and "truth" are all exaggerations of the same idea.
<h3>What are other criticisms of the Philosophy of Perennialism?</h3>
1. In the present high-tech age, focusing on the study of classics and literature is completely impossible and extremely nonsensical, since students are exposed to a tremendous reservoir of knowledge that would allow them live sufficiently in an ever-changing society.
2. Perennialist perspectives on vocational education are flawed since they support it for intellectual growth but not for the development of technical and practical skills for economic self-sufficiency.
3. It is not good to focus on the past at the expense of the present. The present is as significant as the past and illuminates the path to the future.
4. Perennialists' focus on intellectual aristocracy is also irrational and undesirable, as intelligence is simply one aspect of an individual's identity. Other parts of personality cannot be changed.
<h3>What is Perennial Philosophy?</h3>
The perennial philosophy, also known as perennialism and perennial wisdom, is a philosophical and spiritual perspective that holds that all of the world's religious traditions share a single, metaphysical truth or origin from which all esoteric and exoteric knowledge and doctrine derive.
Learn more about Perennial Philosophy:
brainly.com/question/18993409
#SPJ1
