The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
<span>external, all they wanted was the money he had on him because they were hungry, holding him for ransom would take too much time</span>
The central idea of the excerpt from Annus Mirabilis by John Dryden where it speaks about London after how it was ravaged by plague and fire, is B. where despite the calamities that happened to London, it will once again thrive. Even though a great catastrophe has fallen on London, it doesn’t deter it from rising and flourishing once more.
Is this the entire question!?
Answer:
Option D because all of these are protected under the Freedom of Petition.
Explanation:
