Answer:1) Under the Articles there was only a unicameral legislature so that there was no separation of powers.
2) The central government under the Articles was too weak since the majority of the power rested with the states.
3) Congress, under the Articles, did not have the power to tax which meant that they could never put their finances in order.
4) In order to change or amend the Articles, unanimous approval of the states was required which essentially meant that changes to the Articles were impossible.
5) For any major laws to pass they had to be approved by 9 or the 13 states which proved difficult to do so that even the normal business of running a government was difficult.
Explanation:
easy
The mason source is lake Victoria
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The section "The atomic bomb: A controversial weapon" contributed to the development of ideas in the text in the following way.
In this section of the article, the author writes that even today, historians and scholars still debate the idea of if launching the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a good idea of President Harry Truman or not. Some say that using the atomic bomb helped to end the war quickly, but other scholars said that the bomb killed so many people and left too much destruction.
The title of the article is "The Bombing of Hiroshima," and was written by author Jessica McBirney in 2017.
I think it started in the 18th and 19th centuries, there was no real distinction between
scientist and philosopher, and many of the great scientist-philosophers
of antiquity were also theologians.
Science gave philosophy a way of empirically testing theories and concepts, whilst philosophy has helped to develop the scientific method used today.
Philosophy
also dictates what areas science can and cannot test, delineating the
boundary between physical and metaphysical questions. These boundaries
and the rules governing research have developed over the centuries, and
philosophy and science are intertwined.
The history of the philosophy of science shows the development of the underlying methodology and foundations of the scientific process, and shaped science.
