1.
Huddle
Tungle.com
Picnik
pidgin
2. Bleep, bleep, bleep.' What's going on? Is this a lesson on profanity? No - that right there is the sound of censorship, or the suppression of information. Censorship can take many forms, from burning books to restricting what information is available on the Internet for the citizens of an entire country. At its most basic, it's all about the control of information. Whoever owns the access to information can decide what people learn and what they do not. This can be governments, private companies, mass media - any group that in some way controls access to information. But why? Well, a government or a private company may not want people finding out too much about their policies because the result could be a rebellion. Knowledge can be power. But can censorship be a good thing, too? Well, let's take a look, and then you can decide for yourself. We promise not to censor you.
Ex:
<span>The Lord Chamberlain’s Office Britain
</span>The Australian Classification Board Australia
<span>The Motion Pictures Producers And </span>Distributors Of America <span>USA
3.</span>The p-health approach suggests that providing remote patients with a feeling of social presence [21] plays a crucial role in improving therapeutic effectiveness. Through social presence, users experience a feeling of inhabiting a shared space with one or more others, and their awareness of mediation by technology recedes into the background [22]. Social presence requires participants to experience themselves as co-located and mutually aware of, responsive to, and responsible to one another [23]. As suggested by Casanueva and Blake [24<span>], the sense of social presence consists of the belief that the other people in the virtual environment are real and really present and that the user and the others are part of a group and process.</span>
“The last time I visited my hometown was two years ago; nothing looked the same.” The “;” is used to declare a new thought taking place in the same sentence. The rest are all improper.
Both men believe that their sons should be held accountable for their behavior.
Willie admits to Mister Edward that Mitchell is responsible when he says, "what he done" referring to Mitchell. The consequence for Mitchell is a strapping with a whip. Mister Edward also believes that Paul must be held accountable. In his dialogue, it's clear that he believes Paul deserves a punishment. However, he chooses not to whip Paul. Instead he revokes all of Paul's horse-riding privileges. He says, "you'll never get to ride Ghost Wind again...You won't ride any of the other horses either." Mister Edward believes that keeping Paul from riding the horses will keep him from doing something like this again since he'll remember the consequence and his actions better than if he had been whipped.
In normal circumstances, other punctuation marks (commas, colons, or parentheses) should be used. When you want a phrase or another part of the sentence to have extra emphasis, a dash may be used.
