The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals is known to have denied McMillian's appeal even when Stevenson had made his argument that there was no reliable corroboration of Myers' testimony and also under Alabama law.
- The reason is that the State could not depend totally on the testimony given by an accomplice, as there was an incidence of prosecutorial misconduct and also racially discriminatory jury.
- Yes, he seems more reliable as a witness now than when he was put on the stand based on the fact that he was not influenced into giving any kind of fabrication of facts but due to his stand to tell the truth.
- Payne vs. Tennessee is known to be a 1991 case that decided that a testimony given in the form of a victim impact statement can be taken in or admissible in any kind of sentencing stage of any trial and also in death penalty cases. I believe it is good or justified.
Thinking back to chapter 5 of "Just Mercy" i am hopefully now for Walter’s release because he is innocent and deserve to be given justice.
<h3>What is the message of Just Mercy about?</h3>
Just Mercy is a book written by Bryan Stevenson and talks about his wrongful conviction and his fight for his freedom.
The book centers around America's faulted criminal justice system and makes us as humans to tackle these inequality and injustice.
Learn more about Just Mercy from
brainly.com/question/25480701
<span>Dear J.K. Rowling
I really appreciated your book "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince". The serious tone Harry uses when speaking truly underlines dire times felt within the wizarding world. I could never find the right words to use when setting my plot, but I was truly inspired by your use of diction to control the tempo of a long narrative. This tempo control ran throughout the text, emotionally tying specific plot devices to the perspective of a character and framing their state of being.
In conclusion, I hope my writing can glimpse a shadow of your craft. When I write in first person, as you did with Harry, I often now compare my use of language to your descriptive tendencies and search for improvements. Not writing extremely long sentences, or using out of character phrasing, but instead giving just enough detail to paint a vivid picture. If this gets to you, I hope you can write me back, I've attatched a pdf of a recent poem and hope you can give me some notes.
Thank you,
Sincerly...</span>
The answer is who because whom is not really saying what she is wondering
Answer:
there are no answer choices
Explanation:
Answer:
She first examines how many suffragists endured great pain and suffering, and then she talks about how this history is critical to understand.
Explanation:
She talked about her people dealing with pain and suffering then she is telling us about how we only know half the truth
