I will have to go with
2. Slavery had a dehumanizing effect on slave owners as well.
and
3. Her goodness made her unique compared to most slave owners.
Hope this helped!
Can I have brainliest when a second person answers?
The Indian social system was influenced by the concept of varna.[2] Varna is not caste and caste is not Varna. This is a critical difference not understood by many. It directly linked religious belief and the segregation of society into status groups. Weber goes on to describe the Varna system (the Brahmins - priests, the Kshatriyas - warriors, the Vaishyas - merchants, the Shudras - laborers and the untouchables).
Weber pays special attention to Brahmins and considers why they occupied the highest place in Indian society for many centuries. With regards to the concept of dharma he concludes that the Indian ethical pluralism is very different both from the universal ethic of Confucianism and Christianity. He notes that the varna system prevented the development of urban status groups.<span>[3]</span>
Answer:
This question refers to W. Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar."
Explanation:
From Julius Caesar's speeches it can be interpreted that he can be both a good leader and a bad one. This character is really very controversial. In general, the strategies of his speech are typical of masking and deception.
Just as he had the great ability to do incredible things for Rome, many of them were questioned as they annoyed many people, such as Brutus, who believed that Caesar was not a great leader but rather someone impulsive and young.
Therefore, his skills as a leader will be interpreted by each person differently.
in my explanation the numbers are paragraphs
Explanation:
1.
uncomfortable
2.
doesn't look good
3.
redistricting
4.
why you dont like it