1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleonysh [2.5K]
2 years ago
5

Paralegals handle sensitive information related to legal cases and are often responsible for creating and maintaining legal docu

ments. Divulging this information is not only unethical but, sometimes, illegal. Which of the following examples would be considered unethical?
Law
1 answer:
klio [65]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:What are the ethical violations of a paralegal?

Here are five ethical dilemmas that paralegals encounter in their work:

Unauthorized Practice. ...

Maintaining Confidentiality. ...

Supervising Attorney Reviewing the Paralegal's Work. ...

Role of Technology. ...

Conflicts of Interest

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Whom should Mrs. Hightower sue for damages? Mr.Grant Why?
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

Money damages are awarded by the court to make defendants pay you money to make up for harm you suffered in the past. Punitive damages may be awarded to punish defendants for especially bad conduct.

An injunction is a court order that directs prison officials to make changes in your prison conditions and/or stop ongoing conduct that the court finds to be illegal.

A declaratory judgment is when a court makes a decision that explains your legal rights and the legal duties and obligations of the prison officials. However, the court doesn’t order the prison to do or stop doing anything. If you get a declaratory judgment and the prison doesn’t follow it, you can then ask the court for an injunction to make them do so.

8 0
3 years ago
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Luda [366]

Answer:

police

Explanation:

police vehicles

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me......please and thank you♡
Pie

by Susan B. Anthony (excerpt) Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny. The preamble of the Federal Constitution says: "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people—women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government—the ballot.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Create a pamphlet explaining the guidelines you would suggest for federal financing of presidential campaigns.
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

ni

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are
marin [14]

Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims

The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced

The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws

However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority

Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:

brainly.com/question/9321150

brainly.com/question/14049478

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Zoning is an exercise of which type of general limitation on property rights?
    11·1 answer
  • Which style of communication should officers maintain?
    9·1 answer
  • For laws against shoplifting, pick at least one of the four grounds for justification—legal moralism, the harm principle, legal
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP ME (fast please also maybe heh)
    11·2 answers
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • 1. The Constitution spells out
    9·1 answer
  • Give your own example of the 6th Amendment.
    15·2 answers
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations​
    6·2 answers
  • After the crime scene has been secured, what is the next step for an investigator?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these items should not be used if a car is leaking gasoline?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!