1) the central government could not collect debts from the states
2) 9 states needed to approve congressional legislation
3)all 13 colonies needed to amend the Articles
<span>4) the central government could not raise revenue</span>
Hope I Helped You!!! :-)
Have A Good Day!!!
The first two statementz are the true ones because in the revolution, the french saw america as a weeb country. but once they saw how well america was doing against Britain, they chose to help america by giving aid and weapons.
and without the help of the French, america really would have lost the war because they were losing soldiers fast due to lack of resoures and disease lol.
plus the third one is wrong because the question os asking for US & France not France & Britain smh :)
Answer:
In 1762, Pontiac enlisted support from practically every Indian tribe from Lake Superior to the lower Mississippi for a joint campaign to expel the British from the formerly French lands. According to Pontiac's plan, each tribe would seize the nearest fort and then join forces to wipe out the undefended settlements.
Answer:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court
