I do not believe a comma is necessary in this sentence at all. In fact, if you were to insert a comma after the word grazed (as you maybe tempted to do) it could change the meaning of the sentence. If you meant the lions were oblivious of the presence of the gazelles, you would insert a comma after grazed. But if you meant the gazelles were oblivious of the presence of the lions, you would leave the comma out.
Answer:
The revision which is the best example of adding concrete detail is:
Claire Innes was separated from the people around her during the fire and she later found them near the same place they were separated.
The other options do not apply because the original sentence does not talk about Claire Innes' parents or family
Claire Innes became separated from her parents as the flames spread through the city, and she later found them.
In the panic, Claire Innes was separated from her family as they fled, and she was reunited with her father after the fire was extinguished.
In the panic, Claire Innes became separated from her brothers and sisters during the fire and she later found them after the fire was put out.
Explanation:
Answer:the poem begins with all CAP letters
Explanation:
Ik
MORE CAUTIOUS SORRY FOR PUTTING IT IN ALL CAPS BUT
Answer:
Elisa has a deep relationship with both environments. The garden of chrysanthemums nearly seems like an extension: it's her garden, and the space and the flowers within it are responsibility her. When the environment is changed to the road, Elisa is physically and mentally also moving and shifting.
Explanation:
This answer is for the attached picture...
Question is:
It's just one paragraph proving how the setting reveals information about a character aka how Elisa leaving the ranch and going on the road into town shows her weakness= she's confident at home in her garden, but when she leaves, she shows vulnerability and weakness.
