Answer:
Where you only give the main points from a source: Summary
A portion of a text that is 4 lines or longer: Long quote
When you use your own words to talk about what happened: Paraphrase
A portion of a text that is less than 4 lines: Short quote
Am no professional but enlargement would do but she should first talk to a physician and you shouldn't worry about your breasts there's more to life that just that
Answer:
B) She ruled the bright clouds that gleam in the summer sky and caused them to pour their showers on meadow, forest, and mountains.
Explanation:
This option seems to be the correct one as it gives the information in a
very articulated, and concise way. Also, the option is properly punctuated. Removing "where the mountains were" to just make it "mountains" makes the most sense and is more appropriate
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
