Answer:
the business case
Explanation:
This argument is an example of a business case. A business case tries to state the reasons behind initiating a project. It gives the justification for undertaking a project. A company can generate it's profit through a business case. This question is making an argument on how canada's global markets can be expanded through diversity-related initiatives. The argument mentions supporters of diversity management in driving it's points.
<span>Linkedin receives more than 50% of its
visitors from countries like Costa rica, Malaysia, Singapore, and the United
Kingdom. Linkedin is a social network service where people will be connected and
can share their information about their professional and business profiles.
Through Linkedin, companies can show case their company profile and job
opportunities to the people who are signed up in this application. Members of
Linkedin consist of 500 million people. </span>
Answer:
Answer is option C i.e. ensure a cash shortage does not cause an inability to meet current obligations.
Explanation:
Debt covenants can be understood as an agreement between the lenders and the borrower. There are certain terms that are to be considered by the parties of the agreement. One such term is the maintenance of a minimum level of net working capital so that when a company/organization that has borrowed the money runs bankrupt can meet its obligation to pay back the required amount to the lender on time. Therefore, maintenance of a minimum level of net working capital is to ensure that the cash shortage does not cause an inability to meet current obligations.
Answer:
Option C. The highest NPV is always the best option.
Explanation:
The reason is that IRR assumes that the reinvestment rate is also at IRR which is not a realistic assumption. The Net Present Value resolves this as it assumes that the reinvestment rate is cost of capital and hence is more better than IRR to appraise the project.
The decision rule in the Net present value method is that the project which has higher positive Net present value is regarded as best project among two mutually exclusive projects.
Answer: He should should File a suit.
Explanation:
He should should File a suit.
The new innovation was Frederick's brain child, I believe God gave him this innovative Idea he could change people's lives professionally and even personally. Frederick should only sue the Professors for the use of his innovative idea and the Patents for this innovation to be transferred back to the rightful owner of innovation (Frederick) and not to sue them for everything they have the aim here is to teach/show professors that stealing is wrong and not to punish.
We should not let evil doers prevail, suing Professors will teach them a lesson that stealing a person's idea is wrong and they should not do it again, if Frederick doesnot sue the professors would probably do it to another student. Frederick's law suit will not only help him but it will actually save a lot of students coming after him which is what Christianity is teach us to do good for other people.
