The answer is -ARGUMENTS-. I got it correct on my exam.
Answer:
For a good introduction you could use something related to what you are going to write about.
Explanation:
For example If the passage is about the ocean you could put Lets dive into the deep blue sea as the intro
Answer: even the most bigoted judge is required to recognize that you have a right to jury trial and a right to be presumed innocent unit proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Some judges are exceedingly fair. Some judges are brilliant and a great gift to humanity.
Explanation: um Hope this help
Option C, "So, Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense"
So, what is the question being asked here? Is it for us to actually write a letter. Or is it for us to answer?