The process of increasing the amount of capital used per worker is called Capital Deepening.
Capital Deepening is a term used in economics to describe a situation in which capital increases per worker, is an increase in capital intensity. It is often measured by the stock of capital per hour of work. In general, the economy will expand, and the producitivity of each worker will increase. However, the intensification of the capital factor will not mean that the economic expansion will continue indefinitely, partly due to diminishing returns. The investment is also required to increase the amount of capital available for each worker in the system and therefore increase the proportion of capital with respect to labor, this promote economic growth , because the increase in productivity requieres the accumulation of all stocks of capital per worker.
<span>Contrary to uninformed opinion, defendants who are found
not guilty by the reason of insanity are not merely released from the custody.
They are usually committed into mental hospitals where they are confined for duration
longer than their prison terms would have been. For example in the case
of Jones v. United States, the Supreme Court in 1983 backed this
proposition, ruling that the sentence that criminal defendants should have received
had they been convicted shall have no bearing on how long they could be
committed to a mental hospital.</span>
<span>Therefore the correct answer to fill in the blank is “may
be longer”.</span>
Answer:
1)Socialism means equality in society and democratic socialism means equality in a democratic state.
2) Compared to Socialism, Democratic socialism has foreseen the event of the limitation of private property only for the benefit of the public.
3) Democratic socialists reject the inequalities among the classes of people
Explanation:
It is the view that accepts that the structure of a socialist society can be reached through democratic means and wants to dominate an economically socialist and politically democratic structure at the same time. Democratic socialism - recognizes that the social structure that Marx aimed for with "scientific socialism" or "revolutionary socialism" can be reached in democratic ways and believes that the property structure in the socialist economy, central planning activity will function more efficiently within a democratic political structure.
Since democracy necessarily envisions a compromise between the various views and interests in society, democratic socialism has foreseen the event of the limitation of private property only for the benefit of the public.
As a result of the rapid development of capitalism, democratic socialists reject the class inequalities when social welfare is distributed more equitably among the various classes in society. They do not admit that after the stages of democracy in the Western world, one's rights and freedoms can be taken further back than they are today. they believe that private property, which will be restricted and restricted in the public interest, can only be nationalized with the general approval of the public.
The most important feature of democratic socialism is the belief that democracy can only be achieved through a socialist economic planning and property structure.
Answer:
In keeping with the subject of the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, May 17, 2014 marks the 60th anniversary of the issuance of the decision on Brown v. Board of Education. Brown is a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that, contrary to the legal doctrine of separate but equal, “separate education facilities are inherently unequal” and ended segregation in the United States. While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance.
As I wrote about earlier in the blog, the case Hernández v. Texas was decided just two weeks prior to Brown; but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement: Méndez v. Westminster. While many scholars of educational desegregation assure us that the beginning of the end of the “separate but equal” doctrine was set underway with Brown v. Board of Education. It could be argued that the beginning of that end may actually date back seven years prior, Méndez v. Westminster, which ended the almost 100 years of segregation that had remained a practice since the end of the U.S.-Mexico War of 1848 and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The end of the U.S.-Mexico War gave rise to “anti-immigrant sentiments [that] resulted in increased measures to segregate Mexican-Americans from so-called ‘white’ public institutions such as swimming pools, parks, schools, and eating establishments.”
Méndez v. Westminster School District of Orange County was a federal court case that challenged racial segregation in the education system of Orange County, California. Five Mexican-American fathers—Thomas Estrada, William Guzmán, Gonzalo Méndez, Frank Palomino, and Lorenzo Ramírez—set out to challenge the practice of school segregation in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Their claim was that their children and some 5,000 others of Mexican ancestry, had fallen victim to unconstitutional discriminatory practices by being forced to attend separate schools that had been designated “schools for Mexicans” in the school districts of El Modena, Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Westminster—all of which were in Orange County. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the segregation of Mexican and Mexican-American students, by relegating them to “Mexican Schools,” was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
Answer:
The correct answer is : Dissociative reference group
Explanation:
This kind of group is a group with whom a person does not want to be associated or identified as one of them. He has a concept in which exists a framework that assumes that people's values and attitudes, can be shaped by their identification with. This can happen when you are compared to others.
