1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksanka [162]
3 years ago
8

Decide whether each statement is a positive or negative effect of replacing the stop signs at intersections with

Law
2 answers:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. Signals would cost more than stop signs.

<em>negative </em>

2. According to data, there are fewer accidents at intersections with signals compared to those with stop signs.

<em>positive </em>

Explanation:

that was in edg

SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
3 0
For statement 1. It is a positive to an extent. Stop sighs can often be covered in graffiti, which can began to cost more and more every time you repaint them. For statement 2 and 3. Traffic signals would cause less accidents because of the fact that they “force” you to stop, they give every car a chance to go, and give pedestrians the right of way to walk as well.
You might be interested in
a man is accused of holding up a liquor store and stealing hundreds of dollars from the cash register. where is this case heard
Pepsi [2]

The will be first heard at a trial court.

The trial courts of a U.S. federal judiciary are the district courts. Every federal judicial district, each of which covers one U.S. state or, in certain cases, a portion of a state, has one district court. There is minimum one courthouse for every district court, but many districts have much more than one. Decisions of district courts may be appealed to a U.S. court of appeals again for relevant circuit.

District courts have jurisdiction over both civil and criminal issues and thus are court of law, justice, and admiralty. Federal district courts, in contrast to American state courts, have a narrower scope of jurisdiction and are only able to hear cases involving conflicts between citizens of different states, issues of federal law, and federal offences.

To know more about federal judiciary:

brainly.com/question/18868646

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Who is able to change/modify or remove the order Stay-at-home in the US?
lys-0071 [83]

Answer:

The governors of the states and/or the president.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Holt and collins decide to have their dispute arbitrated by corrales. What will not be a result of the arbitration?
Savatey [412]

Answer:

If Holt and Collins retain the right to a Class action.

Explanation:

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. The Parties involved in the case refer their disputes to an arbitrator who will making a decision after reviewing the evidence and listening to the parties.

Arbitration clauses can be mandatory or voluntary, and the arbitrator's decision may be binding or nonbinding. (binding means you are not going to court again, but would abide by the decisions if the arbitrator).

Furthermore, the Arbitration is a legal technique used by the parties involved in a dispute to resolve the disputes outside the courts, the parties refer the disputes to one or more persons called either the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal", by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound.

Then A "class action" lawsuit or the

"mass tort litigation" is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. It can also be called the "multi-district litigation".

If Holt and Collins decide to retain the right to a Class action, it will definitely not be the result of an arbitration.

8 0
3 years ago
Bankruptcy of the principal​
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:The uni trimester ended while leaves still clung to the trees. Betsie found herself missing the crunching sound of the fallen leaves as she travelled home, the audible sound of autumn weather that usually meant it was holiday time.

Elaine greeted her daughter at the door. A candle burned on the fireplace, it resembled a small amount of warmth yet to come.

Arthur had gone to collect wood, Elaine told Betsie. “He’s losing it. I’m over him. I know we had you late and all, and it is harder I guess when you have a child at a late age but it’s not you that worries me. You are fine!”

Elaine plonked her rear down on the floral armchair, it rocked a little then came back to centre – she didn’t flinch when the hot tea soaked her leg.

It reminded Betsie of a time when she watched her mother push material underneath the foot of the sewing needle. The chain roared while Elaine’s fingers pressed the material. Then she watched as her mother’s finger slipped underneath the foot, punctured by the sharp end of the needle which went all the way through her finger. Elaine didn’t flinch, she finished running that edge, then licked her finger between her thin lips before changing the edge around. Betsie had stared at her mother in wonder.

“I don’t not love Arthur but I don’t like him.” Elaine sipped her tea and it spilled over her chin on to her knitted woollen cardigan.

The candle flickered against the wall above the fire.

“Jane told me, you know young Jane, the teacher next door? She told me that she saw Arthur at the car out front and you know what he said to her? He said ‘I thought I saw a blonde girl walking towards me and I’m blind enough that I couldn’t see her until she was on top of me.’ Then he got in his car and drove off! I’ve told him not to drive. But you know.”

“Mum, cars have always been Arthur’s passion.”

Elaine’s eyes flickered.

Arthur appeared at the arched entry to the lounge room. “You’re near the sex candle. Cost me a lot of sex, that candle!”

“Arthur! Your daughter has come home.”

Arthur giggled. “Whoops! How are you dear?”

“Good dad.”

“Come out back and I’ll show you the beast.”

“New car dad?”

“Old car-new engine!”

“Great!”

Arthur and Betsie left Elaine and the candle flickering in the lounge room.

In the shed they examined a beautiful old Willy’s Jeep with a motor cradled in the bonnet, still chained up on the hoist.

“Now darling,” he turned to his daughter. “I know what you’re thinking. Another car! This old cob can’t deserve another car, can he? But with your mum and all, it’s been hard. Her dementia is getting worse and, well, I need some space.”

Arthur’s eyes flickered.

“I do love your mum. It’s just that, sometimes I don’t like her.”

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
in marbury v. madison, the supreme court established a principle that would eventually be used by all courts to
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

in marbury v. madison, the supreme court established a principle that would eventually be used by all courts to

Judicial review

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how a case gets from trial court to the supreme court.
    15·1 answer
  • Although California law doesn't assess any penalties against an entity that doesn't follow the notification law, it does permit
    15·1 answer
  • Who convince your parents to sign papers to become emancipated
    9·1 answer
  • Arrange the stages of a parole release process
    13·1 answer
  • Maintaining the security of crime scene photographs is vitally important. Every time photographs change possession, the name of
    10·1 answer
  • What do these terms mean?
    12·1 answer
  • _______________ is the best solution to preventing intoxication.
    13·2 answers
  • Yall please help me!!I need to turn this is asap like very soon​
    10·1 answer
  • On April 16, 1982, at 10 pm Ray Johnson and his eight-year-old son David were waiting for a "walk" signal before crossing a stre
    7·2 answers
  • DON'T ANSWER THIS! (You can answer AFTER 201600823 answers! She is my sis!)
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!