C. increase in the interest rate
Answer:
Monthly Interest rate = 0.475%
EAR = 5.85%
Explanation:
a.
APR = 5.7%
Monthly Interest rate = APR / n
Monthly Interest rate = 5.7% / 12
Monthly Interest rate = 0.475%
b.
APR = 5.7%
m = 12
EAR = [ ( 1 + (APR / m))^m] - 1
EAR = [( 1 + (0.057 / 12))^12] - 1
EAR = [( 1 + 0.00475 )^12] - 1
EAR = [( 1.00475 )^12] - 1
EAR = 1.0585 - 1
EAR = 0.0585
EAR = 5.85%
True monthly rate of interest is 0.475%
EAR is 5.85%
Answer:
B) $2,500 per month rent.
Explanation:
Incremental cash flows do not include interest payments on investment capital, since the cash flows should be equally generated if you invest your own money, another partner invests his money or someone else lends it to you. The same logic applies to the administrative costs of the credit line.
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO A TEMPORARY SITUATION.
Explanation:
Attribution theory deals with how the social perceiver uses information to arrive at causal explanations for events. It examines what information is gathered and how it is combined to form a causal judgment.
Explanatory style is the characteristic, habitual way individuals explain the causes of good and bad events they experience.
Stressful events can either be good or bad. People may attribute stressful events to factors that are either temporary or permanent and specific or universal.
Carmela's thought means she is explaining her stressful work (event) by attributing it to a temporary situation since she thinks she will get the hang of it in a few months.
Therefore, an example of the explanatory style is EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO TEMPORARY EVENTS.
